EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001584_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Sun Oct 29 10:27:01 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA104201221; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 10:27:01 -0800
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mail02.mail.aol.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA103991213; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 10:26:53 -0800
Received: by mail02.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA24593; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 13:20:05 -0500
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 13:20:05 -0500
From: [e-mail]
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: SUBST and WinNT - How?!?
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

In a message dated 95-10-29 00:12:32 EST, you write:
>If you weren't an NT guru when you decided to get your system, you probably
>didn't set up your system to be Lightwave friendly by having a partition
that
>you could give a nice network drive letter to.

Actually, it's more of being a LightWave guru.
LWSN is the one with the funky requirements, not WinNT.

I've noticed that the access time to directories that are exported&imported
on the same machine is noticably slower. I don't see as to how this would
slow down rendering all that much, however, I do find the delay annoying in
everyday use. (It's less than a second, but noticably slower than under
Win95.)

Erik Flom - ELF Works 3D Construction Co.
--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]